5 thoughts on “In your opinion, is it necessary for a wedding artist to bring a wedding ring under the public lens?”
Stella
Is it necessary for a wedding artist to wear a wedding ring under the public lens? In fact, it is a personal problem to see the artist's own needs. Why care too much about outsiders? Nowadays, many married artists appear under the public's lens. There is no wedding ring, which attracts controversy. This is not necessary. Although it is said that there are wedding rings in marriage, and wearing wedding rings represent marriage The marriage people do not wear a wedding ring. Why should the artist ask the artist to wear a wedding ring under the public lens? The wedding ring is a token that publicly announces the marriage alliance. The married person puts it on the ring finger, which means the purity of love. Many people will show their wedding rings when they get married, but not every married person will wear a wedding ring. . The wedding ring of the married stars is a star. Not to mention that the waist is entangled, it is also the ranks of the rich people. They also attach great importance to their lifelong events. Stars in the entertainment industry, some wedding rings can definitely be described as sky -high. For example, Liang Chaowei and Carina Lau, who were married in 2008, were worth more than 20 million yuan; there were 277 diamonds of Huang Xiaoming and Baby; Liu Kaiwei and Yang Mi were also worth 10 million; Jay Chou and Kun Ling's wedding ring. It is the classic model of Cartier's Solitaire 1895 series. The price is self -evident. There are many, many stars, wedding rings are valuable. . Can we wear a wedding ring for marriage? Of course, it is impossible, not to wear a wedding ring, it must be loyal to marriage, and it is good to represent marriage. Many people do not wear wedding rings. They are mainly worried about the loss of wedding rings and in daily life. Sometimes it is not suitable for wearing wedding rings. For example, when you want to make a meal and wash dishes, it is not convenient to wear a wedding ring. Some people only take out the wedding ring when there are major occasions, and they do not wear it at all. But this does not mean that the marriage of others is a problem. Of course, some people are unwilling to wear a ring. They are unwilling to know that others are married, or there is a problem with marriage, but this is only part of it, does not represent the situation of most people. If wedding ring is a very meaningful token. Most people have wedding rings when they get married, but they often wear rings on their hands, but they are just a minority. There are many reasons for not wearing a ring. It may be inconvenient, unaccustomed, or worried about losing, or maybe they are unwilling to know that they are married, of course, it may also be because there is a problem with marriage. Whatever the reason is good, it is not necessary to understand the private affairs of others too much. Under the public lens, the problem of wearing a ring in the public lens can only be said to be the freedom of others. Why do n’t artists wear rings without so many people to discuss, artists need to be taken out.
I think it is his own choice to wear a wedding ring under the public lens. It does n’t matter, others do n’t care, but every time he wears a wedding ring, there will be a topic, and it will be asked by reporters.
Is it necessary for a wedding artist to wear a wedding ring under the public lens? In fact, it is a personal problem to see the artist's own needs. Why care too much about outsiders?
Nowadays, many married artists appear under the public's lens. There is no wedding ring, which attracts controversy. This is not necessary. Although it is said that there are wedding rings in marriage, and wearing wedding rings represent marriage The marriage people do not wear a wedding ring. Why should the artist ask the artist to wear a wedding ring under the public lens? The wedding ring is a token that publicly announces the marriage alliance. The married person puts it on the ring finger, which means the purity of love. Many people will show their wedding rings when they get married, but not every married person will wear a wedding ring.
. The wedding ring of the married stars is a star. Not to mention that the waist is entangled, it is also the ranks of the rich people. They also attach great importance to their lifelong events. Stars in the entertainment industry, some wedding rings can definitely be described as sky -high. For example, Liang Chaowei and Carina Lau, who were married in 2008, were worth more than 20 million yuan; there were 277 diamonds of Huang Xiaoming and Baby; Liu Kaiwei and Yang Mi were also worth 10 million; Jay Chou and Kun Ling's wedding ring. It is the classic model of Cartier's Solitaire 1895 series. The price is self -evident. There are many, many stars, wedding rings are valuable.
. Can we wear a wedding ring for marriage? Of course, it is impossible, not to wear a wedding ring, it must be loyal to marriage, and it is good to represent marriage. Many people do not wear wedding rings. They are mainly worried about the loss of wedding rings and in daily life. Sometimes it is not suitable for wearing wedding rings. For example, when you want to make a meal and wash dishes, it is not convenient to wear a wedding ring. Some people only take out the wedding ring when there are major occasions, and they do not wear it at all. But this does not mean that the marriage of others is a problem. Of course, some people are unwilling to wear a ring. They are unwilling to know that others are married, or there is a problem with marriage, but this is only part of it, does not represent the situation of most people.
If wedding ring is a very meaningful token. Most people have wedding rings when they get married, but they often wear rings on their hands, but they are just a minority. There are many reasons for not wearing a ring. It may be inconvenient, unaccustomed, or worried about losing, or maybe they are unwilling to know that they are married, of course, it may also be because there is a problem with marriage. Whatever the reason is good, it is not necessary to understand the private affairs of others too much. Under the public lens, the problem of wearing a ring in the public lens can only be said to be the freedom of others. Why do n’t artists wear rings without so many people to discuss, artists need to be taken out.
I think it is necessary to put on a wedding ring to show my love for my wife at the current public. I personally think that this is very important.
I think it is his own choice to wear a wedding ring under the public lens. It does n’t matter, others do n’t care, but every time he wears a wedding ring, there will be a topic, and it will be asked by reporters.
no need. Because it is your own right to bring a wedding ring, it should not be mandatory because of the identity of the public.
It depends on the artist's own wishes. If you want to wear a wedding ring, take it. If you feel too cumbersome, remove it.